SB285: Bill Text

SB285, s. 75 Section 75. 343.23 (2) (b) of the statutes, as affected by 2009 Wisconsin Act 100, section 15, is amended to read:

SB285,35,13 343.23 (2) (b) The information specified in pars. (a) and (am) must be filed by the department so that the complete operator's record is available for the use of the secretary in determining whether operating privileges of such person shall be suspended, revoked, canceled, or withheld, or the person disqualified, in the interest of public safety. The record of suspensions, revocations, and convictions that would be counted under s. 343.307 (2) shall be maintained permanently. The record of convictions for disqualifying offenses under s. 343.315 (2) (h) shall be maintained for at least 10 years. The record of convictions for disqualifying offenses under s. 343.315 (2) (f), (j), and (L), and all records specified in par. (am), shall be maintained for at least 3 years. The record of convictions for disqualifying offenses under s. 343.315 (2) (a) to (e) shall be maintained permanently, except that 5 years after a licensee transfers residency to another state such record may be transferred to another state of licensure of the licensee if that state accepts responsibility for maintaining a permanent record of convictions for disqualifying offenses. Such reports and records may be cumulative beyond the period for which a license is granted, but the secretary, in exercising the power of suspension granted under s. 343.32 (2) may consider only those reports and records entered during the 4-year period immediately preceding the exercise of such power of suspension.

Note: The underscored comma was deleted by 2009 Wis. Act 100 without being shown as stricken. No change was intended.

SB285, s. 76 Section 76. The treatment of 343.315 (3) (b) of the statutes by 2009 Wisconsin Act 28 is not repealed by 2009 Wisconsin Act 103. Both treatments stand.

Note: There is no conflict of substance. As merged by the legislative reference bureau, s. 343.315 (3) (b) reads:

(b) If a person's license or operating privilege is not otherwise revoked or suspended as the result of an offense committed after March 31, 1992, which results in disqualification under sub. (2) (a) to (f), (h) to (j), or (L), the department shall immediately disqualify the person from operating a commercial motor vehicle for the period required under sub. (2) (a) to (f), (h) to (j), or (L). Upon proper application by the person and payment of the fees specified in s. 343.21 (1) (L) and (n), the department may issue a separate license authorizing only the operation of vehicles other than commercial motor vehicles.

SB285, s. 77 Section 77. The treatment of 343.38 (2) of the statutes by 2009 Wisconsin Act 100 is not repealed by 2009 Wisconsin Act 103. Both treatments stand.

Note: There is no conflict of substance. As merged by the legislative reference bureau, s. 343.38 (2) reads:

(2) Reinstatement of nonresident's operating privilege. A nonresident's operating privilege revoked or suspended under the laws of this state is reinstated as a matter of law when the period of revocation or suspension has expired and the nonresident pays the fees specified in s. 343.21 (1) (j), (jr), if applicable, and (n).

SB285, s. 78 Section 78. 343.44 (2) (am) of the statutes is repealed.

Note: Repeals obsolete provision. This provision provides a penalty for violations of s. 343.44 (1) (b) that occurred before May 1, 2002. The criminal statute of limitations has now run on any violation committed prior to May 1, 2002.

SB285, s. 79 Section 79. 343.44 (2) (b) (intro.) of the statutes is amended to read:

SB285,36,7 343.44 (2) (b) (intro.) Except as provided in pars. (am) and par. (as), any person who violates sub. (1) (b) or (d) shall be fined not more than $2,500 or imprisoned for not more than one year in the county jail or both. In imposing a sentence under this paragraph, or a local ordinance in conformity with this paragraph, the court shall review the record and consider the following:

Note: Section 343.44 (2) (am) is repealed by the previous section of this bill.

SB285, s. 80 Section 80. 345.47 (1) (c) of the statutes, as affected by 2009 Wisconsin Acts 100 and 103, is amended to read:

SB285,36,20 345.47 (1) (c) If a court suspends an operating privilege under this section, the court may take possession of the suspended license. If the court takes possession of a license, it shall destroy the license. The court shall forward to the department the notice of suspension, which shall clearly state that the suspension was for failure to pay a forfeiture, plus costs, fees, and surcharges imposed under ch. 814 or for failure to comply with an installment payment plan ordered by the court. The notice of suspension shall be forwarded to the department within 48 hours after the order of suspension. If the forfeiture, plus costs, fees, and surcharges imposed under ch. 814, are paid during a period of suspension, or if the court orders an installment payment plan under sub. (4), the court shall immediately notify the department. , (jr), if applicable,

Note: The stricken language was inserted by 2009 Wis. Act 100 but rendered superfluous by 2009 Wis. Act 103.

SB285, s. 81 Section 81. The treatment of 346.65 (2c) of the statutes by 2009 Wisconsin Act 100 is not repealed by 2009 Wisconsin Act 180. Both treatments stand.

Note: There is no conflict of substance. As merged by the legislative reference bureau, s. 346.65 (2c) reads:

(2c) In sub. (2) (am) 2., 3., 4., 4m., 5., 6., and 7., the time period shall be measured from the dates of the refusals or violations that resulted in the revocation or convictions. If a person has a suspension, revocation, or conviction for any offense under a local ordinance or a state statute of another state that would be counted under s. 343.307 (1), that suspension, revocation, or conviction shall count as a prior suspension, revocation, or conviction under sub. (2) (am) 2., 3., 4., 4m., 5., 6., and 7.

SB285, s. 82 Section 82. The treatment of 440.08 (2) (a) (intro.) of the statutes by 2009 Wisconsin Act 130 is not repealed by 2009 Wisconsin Act 174. Both treatments stand.

Note: There is no conflict of substance. As merged by the legislative reference bureau, s. 440.08 (2) (a) (intro.) reads:

(a) Except as provided in par. (b) and in ss. 440.51, 442.04, 444.03, 444.11, 447.04 (2) (c) 2., 448.065, 449.17 (1m) (d), and 449.18 (2) (d), the renewal dates for credentials are as follows:

SB285, s. 83 Section 83. 444.11 of the statutes, as affected by 2009 Wisconsin Act 111, is amended to read:

SB285,37,15 444.11 Licenses to matchmakers, referees, contestants, etc. The department may grant licenses upon application and the payment of the prescribed fees to matchmakers, managers, referees, boxers, mixed martial arts fighters, seconds, and trainers in professional contests and amateur mixed martial arts fighting contests. The fees to be paid per year shall be: Matchmakers and managers, $10; referees and judges, $15; examining physicians, $10; boxers, $40 and mixed martial arts fighters, $40; seconds, $40; and timekeepers, $10. The department may limit, suspend, or revoke any license granted under this section or reprimand the licensee upon such cause as it deems sufficient.

Note: Places dollar figure in correct location.

SB285, s. 84 Section 84. The treatment of 447.03 (1) (intro.) of the statutes by 2009 Wisconsin Act 10 is not repealed by 2009 Wisconsin Act 42. Both treatments stand.

Note: There is no conflict of substance. As merged by the legislative reference bureau, s. 447.03 (1) (intro.) reads:

(1) Dentists. Except as provided under sub. (3) and ss. 257.03 and 447.02 (3), no person may do any of the following unless he or she is licensed to practice dentistry under this chapter:

SB285, s. 85 Section 85. The treatment of 655.45 (1) of the statutes by 2009 Wisconsin Act 113 is not repealed by 2009 Wisconsin Act 149. Both treatments stand.

Note: There is no conflict of substance. As merged by the legislative reference bureau, s. 655.45 (1) reads:

(1) For the quarter beginning on July 1, 1986, and for each quarter thereafter, the director of state courts shall file reports complying with sub. (2) with the medical examining board, the physical therapy examining board, the podiatry affiliated credentialing board, the board of nursing and the department, respectively, regarding health care providers licensed by the respective bodies.

SB285, s. 86 Section 86. The treatment of 757.05 (1) (a) of the statutes by 2009 Wisconsin Act 12 is not repealed by 2009 Wisconsin Acts 28 and 100. All treatments stand.

Note: There is no conflict of substance. As merged by the legislative reference bureau s. 757.05 (1) (a) reads:

(a) Whenever a court imposes a fine or forfeiture for a violation of state law or for a violation of a municipal or county ordinance except for a violation of s. 101.123 (2) or (2m), for a financial responsibility violation under s. 344.62 (2), or for a violation of state laws or municipal or county ordinances involving nonmoving traffic violations, violations under s. 343.51 (1m) (b), or safety belt use violations under s. 347.48 (2m), there shall be imposed in addition a penalty surcharge under ch. 814 in an amount of 26 percent of the fine or forfeiture imposed. If multiple offenses are involved, the penalty surcharge shall be based upon the total fine or forfeiture for all offenses. When a fine or forfeiture is suspended in whole or in part, the penalty surcharge shall be reduced in proportion to the suspension.

SB285, s. 87 Section 87. 767.127 (1) of the statutes is amended to read:

SB285,39,14 767.127 (1) Required disclosure. In an action affecting the family, except an action to affirm marriage under s. 767.001 (1) (a), the court shall require each party to furnish, on standard forms required by the court, full disclosure of all assets owned in full or in part by either party separately or by the parties jointly. Disclosure may be made by each party individually or by the parties jointly. Assets required to be disclosed include, but are not be limited to, real estate, savings accounts, stocks and bonds, mortgages and notes, life insurance, retirement interests, interest in a partnership, limited liability company, or corporation, tangible personal property, future interests whether vested or nonvested, and any other financial interest or source. The court shall also require each party to furnish, on the same standard form, information pertaining to all debts and liabilities of the parties. The form used shall contain a statement in conspicuous print that complete disclosure of assets and debts is required by law and deliberate failure to provide complete disclosure constitutes perjury. The court shall require each party to attach to the disclosure form a statement reflecting income earned to date for the current year and the most recent statement under s. 71.65 (1) (a) that the party has received. The court may on its own initiative and shall at the request of either party require the parties to furnish copies of all state and federal income tax returns filed by them for the past 2 years, and may require copies of those returns for prior years.

Note: Deletes word made unnecessary by 2005 Wis. Act 443.

SB285, s. 88 Section 88. 814.63 (2) of the statutes, as affected by 2009 Wisconsin Acts 28 and 100, is amended to read:

SB285,39,23 814.63 (2) Upon the disposition of a forfeiture action in circuit court for violation of a county, town, city, village, town sanitary district , or public inland lake protection and rehabilitation district ordinance, except for an action for a financial responsibility violation under s. 344.62 (2), or for a violation under s. 343.51 (1m) (b) or a safety belt use violation under s. 347.48 (2m), the county, town, city, village, town sanitary district, or public inland lake protection and rehabilitation district shall pay a nonrefundable fee of $5 to the clerk of circuit court.

Note: The underscored "or" was removed by 2009 Wis. Act 100, but its reinsertion is necessary as a result of the treatment by 2009 Wis. Act 28. The stricken comma was inserted by Act 28 but is unnecessary as a result of the treatment by Act 100.

SB285, s. 89 Section 89. 815.18 (2) (i) of the statutes is amended to read:

SB285,40,3 815.18 (2) (i) "Farm products" has the meaning given under s. 409.102 (1) (im) (ig).

Note: Corrects cross-reference. "Farm products" is defined at s. 409.102 (1) (ig). "Farming operation" is defined at s. 409.102 (1) (im).

SB285, s. 90 Section 90. 895.483 (4) of the statutes, as created by 2009 Wisconsin Act 43, is amended to read:

SB285,40,11 895.483 (4) A regional structural collapse team, a member of such a team, and a local agency, as defined in s. 166.22 323.70 (1) (c) (b), that contracts with the division of emergency management in the department of military affairs for the provision of a regional structural collapse team, are immune from civil liability for acts or omissions related to carrying out responsibilities under a contract under s. 166.218 323.72 (1).

Note: Section 166.22 (1) (c) was renumbered s. 323.70 (1) (b) by 2009 Wis. Act 42. Section 166.218 is renumbered s. 323.72 by this bill.

SB285, s. 91 Section 91. 938.02 (8p) of the statutes, as created by 2009 Wisconsin Act 94, is renumbered 938.02 (8e) and amended to read:

SB285,40,20 938.02 (8e) "Indian custodian" means an Indian person who has legal custody under tribal law or custom or under state law of an Indian juvenile who is the subject of an Indian juvenile custody proceeding, as defined in s. 938.028 (2) (b), or of an Indian juvenile in need of protection or services under s. 938.13 (4), (6), (6m), or (7) who is the subject of a temporary physical custody proceeding under ss. 939.19 938.19 to 938.21 or to whom temporary physical care, custody, and control has been transferred by the parent of that juvenile.

Note: Places definition in alphabetical order consistent with current style. Corrects cross-reference. There is no s. 939.19. Sections 938.19 to 938.21 relate to custody proceedings.

SB285, s. 92 Section 92. The treatment of 938.32 (1) (c) 1. c. of the statutes by 2009 Wisconsin Act 79 is not repealed by 2009 Wisconsin Act 185. Both treatments stand.

Note: There is no conflict of substance. As merged by the legislative reference bureau, s. 938.32 (1) (c) 1. c. reads:

c. If a permanency plan has previously been prepared for the juvenile, a finding as to whether the county department or agency has made reasonable efforts to achieve the goal of the juvenile's permanency plan, including, if appropriate, through an out-of-state placement.

SB285, s. 93 Section 93. 938.32 (1) (c) 1m. of the statutes, as created by 2009 Wisconsin Act 79, is amended to read:

SB285,41,15 938.32 (1) (c) 1m. If the juvenile has one or more siblings, as defined in s. 938.38 (4) (br) 1., who have also been removed from the home, the consent decree shall include a finding as to whether the county department or agency primarily responsible for providing services to the juvenile has made reasonable efforts to place the juvenile in a placement that enables the sibling group to remain together, unless the court determines that a joint placement would be contrary to the safety or well-being of the juvenile or any of those siblings, in which case the court shall order the county department or agency to make reasonable efforts to provide for frequent visitation or other ongoing interaction between the child juvenile and the siblings, unless the court determines that such visitation or interaction would be contrary to the safety or well-being of the juvenile or any of those siblings.

Note: Inserts correct word. The affected sentence contains no antecedent for "the child." The original subject of the sentence is "the juvenile." Chapter 938 relates to juveniles, whereas chapter 48 relates to children. Replacement of the term makes the provision consistent with multiple provisions created in chapter 938 by 2009 Wis. Act 79 that contain otherwise identical language.

SB285, s. 94 Section 94. 938.33 (4) (c) of the statutes, as affected by 2009 Wisconsin Acts 79 and 185, is amended to read:

SB285,42,11 938.33 (4) (c) Specific information showing that continued placement of the juvenile in his or her home would be contrary to the welfare of the juvenile, specific information showing that the county department or the agency primarily responsible for providing services to the juvenile has made reasonable efforts to prevent the removal of the juvenile from the home, while assuring that the juvenile's health and safety are the paramount concerns, unless any of the circumstances specified in s. 938.355 (2d) (b) 1. to 4. applies, and, if a permanency plan has previously been prepared for the juvenile, specific information showing that the county department or agency has made reasonable efforts to achieve the goal of the juvenile's permanency plan, including, if appropriate, through an out-of-state placement,.

Note: 2009 Wis. Act 185 deleted a comma where the underscored comma is inserted, but its reinsertion was made necessary by the treatment by 2009 Wis. Act 79. Act 79 inserted the stricken comma, but it was rendered unnecessary by the treatment by Act 185.

SB285, s. 95 Section 95. 938.335 (3g) (c) of the statutes, as affected by 2009 Wisconsin Acts 79 and 185, is amended to read:

SB285,42,17 938.335 (3g) (c) That, if a permanency plan has previously been prepared for the juvenile, the county department or agency has made reasonable efforts to achieve the goal of the juvenile's permanency plan, including, if appropriate, through an out-of-state placement,.

Note: 2009 Wis. Act 185 deleted a comma where the underscored comma is inserted, but its reinsertion was made necessary by the treatment by 2009 Wis. Act 79. Act 79 inserted the stricken comma, but it was rendered unnecessary by the treatment by Act 185.

SB285, s. 96 Section 96. The treatment of 938.34 (14r) (a) of the statutes by 2009 Wisconsin Act 8 is not repealed by 2009 Wisconsin Act 103. Both treatments stand.

Note: There is no conflict of substance. As merged by the legislative reference bureau, s. 938.34 (14r) (a) reads:

(a) In addition to any other dispositions imposed under this section, if the juvenile is found to have violated ch. 961, the court may suspend the juvenile's operating privilege, as defined in s. 340.01 (40), for not less than 6 months nor more than 5 years. If a court suspends a person's operating privilege under this paragraph, the court may take possession of any suspended license. If the court takes possession of a license, it shall destroy the license. The court shall forward to the department of transportation the notice of suspension stating that the suspension or revocation is for a violation of ch. 961.

SB285, s. 97 Section 97. 938.355 (2) (b) 6. of the statutes, as affected by 2009 Wisconsin Acts 79 and 185, is amended to read:

SB285,44,3 938.355 (2) (b) 6. If the juvenile is placed outside the home, a finding that continued placement of the juvenile in his or her home would be contrary to the welfare of the juvenile or, if the juvenile has been adjudicated delinquent and is placed outside the home under s. 938.34 (3) (a), (c), (cm), or (d) or (4d), a finding that the juvenile's current residence will not safeguard the welfare of the juvenile or the community due to the serious nature of the act for which the juvenile was adjudicated delinquent. The court order shall also contain a finding as to whether the county department or the agency primarily responsible for providing services under a court order has made reasonable efforts to prevent the removal of the juvenile from the home, while assuring that the juvenile's health and safety are the paramount concerns, unless the court finds that any of the circumstances under sub. (2d) (b) 1. to 4. applies, and, if a permanency plan has previously been prepared for the juvenile, a finding as to whether the county department or agency has made reasonable efforts to achieve the goal of the juvenile's permanency plan, including, if appropriate, through an out-of-state placement,. The court shall make the findings specified in this subdivision on a case-by-case basis based on circumstances specific to the juvenile and shall document or reference the specific information on which those findings are based in the court order. A court order that merely references this subdivision without documenting or referencing that specific information in the court order or an amended court order that retroactively corrects an earlier court order that does not comply with this subdivision is not sufficient to comply with this subdivision.

Note: 2009 Wis. Act 185 deleted a comma where the underscored comma is inserted, but its reinsertion was made necessary by the treatment by 2009 Wis. Act 79. Act 79 inserted the stricken comma, but it was rendered unnecessary by the treatment by Act 185.

SB285, s. 98 Section 98. 938.357 (2m) (am) 1. of the statutes, as created by 2009 Wisconsin Act 94, is amended to read:

SB285,44,18 938.357 (2m) (am) 1. If the proposed change of placement would change the placement of an Indian juvenile placed in the home of his or her parent or Indian custodian under s. 938.357 938.13 (4), (6), (6m), or (7) to a placement outside that home, a request under par. (a) shall also contain specific information showing that continued custody of the Indian juvenile by the parent or Indian custodian is likely to result in serious emotional or physical damage to the juvenile under s. 938.028 (4) (d) 1., specific information showing that active efforts under s. 938.028 (4) (d) 2. have been made to prevent the breakup of the Indian juvenile's family and that those efforts have proved unsuccessful, a statement as to whether the new placement is in compliance with the order of placement preference under s. 938.028 (6) (a) or, if applicable, s. 938.028 (6) (b) and, if the new placement is not in compliance with that order, specific information showing good cause, as described in s. 938.028 (6) (d), for departing from that order.

Note: Corrects cross-reference consistent with s. 938.357 (2m) (am) 2. There is no s. 938.357 (6m) or (7). Section 938.13 (4), (6), (6m), or (7) relate to conditions that provide jurisdiction to a court when a juvenile is alleged to be in need of protection or services.

SB285, s. 99 Section 99. 938.365 (2) of the statutes, as affected by 2009 Wisconsin Act 94, section 371, is amended to read:

SB285,45,10 938.365 (2) Notice. No order may be extended without a hearing. The court shall provide notice of the time and place of the hearing to the juvenile or the juvenile's guardian ad litem or counsel, the juvenile's parent, guardian, and legal custodian, all of the parties present at the original hearing, the juvenile's foster parent or other physical custodian described in s. 48.62 (2), and the district attorney or corporation counsel in the county in which the dispositional order was entered. If the juvenile is an Indian juvenile who is in need of protection or services under s. 938.13 (4), (6), (6m), or (7), the court shall also notify the Indian juvenile's Indian custodian and, if that juvenile is placed outside the home of his or her parent or Indian custodian, the Indian juvenile's tribe.

Note: 2009 Wis. Act 94, section 371, repealed and recreated s. 98.365 (2) without taking cognizance of the repeal and recreation of the provision by 2009 Wis. Act 79, section 143. There is no mutual inconsistency between the treatments made by the two acts, and the substantive changes made by Act 79 are made here in order to give effect to both acts.

SB285, s. 100 Section 100. 938.365 (2m) (a) 1. and 1m. of the statutes, as affected by 2009 Wisconsin Act 79, section 146, 2009 Wisconsin Act 94, section 373, and 2009 Wisconsin Act 185, section 179, are amended to read:

SB285,46,2 938.365 (2m) (a) 1. Any party may present evidence relevant to the issue of extension. If the juvenile is placed outside of his or her home, the person or agency primarily responsible for providing services to the juvenile shall present as evidence specific information showing that the person or agency has made reasonable efforts to achieve the goal of the juvenile's permanency plan, including, if appropriate, through an out-of-state placement,. If an Indian juvenile is placed outside the home of his or her parent or Indian custodian under s. 938.13 (4), (6), (6m), or (7), the person or agency primarily responsible for providing services to the Indian juvenile shall also present as evidence specific information showing that active efforts under s. 938.028 (4) (d) 2. have been made to prevent the breakup of the Indian juvenile's family and that those efforts have proved unsuccessful.

SB285,46,12 1m. The court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law based on the evidence. The findings of fact shall include a finding as to whether reasonable efforts were made by the person or agency primarily responsible for providing services to the juvenile to achieve the goal of the juvenile's permanency plan , including, if appropriate, through an out-of-state placement,. If the juvenile is an Indian juvenile who is placed outside the home of his or her parent or Indian custodian under s. 938.13 (4), (6), (6m), or (7), the findings of fact shall also include a finding that active efforts under s. 938.028 (4) (d) 2. were made to prevent the breakup of the Indian juvenile's family and that those efforts have proved unsuccessful. An order shall be issued under s. 938.355.

Note: 2009 Wis. Act 185 deleted a comma where each underscored comma is inserted, but the reinsertion of those commas was made necessary by the treatment by 2009 Wis. Act 79. Act 79 inserted the stricken commas, but they were rendered unnecessary by the treatment by Act 185.

SB285, s. 101 Section 101. 938.365 (2m) (ag) of the statutes, as affected by 2009 Wisconsin Act 94, section 378, is amended to read:

SB285,46,23 938.365 (2m) (ag) The court shall give a foster parent or other physical custodian described in s. 48.62 (2) who is notified of a hearing under sub. (2) an opportunity a right to be heard at the hearing by permitting the foster parent or other physical custodian to make a written or oral statement during the hearing, or to submit a written statement prior to the hearing, relevant to the issue of extension. A foster parent or other physical custodian who receives notice of a hearing under sub. (2) and an opportunity a right to be heard under this paragraph does not become a party to the proceeding on which the hearing is held solely on the basis of receiving that notice and having the opportunity right to be heard.

Note: 2009 Wis. Act 94, section 378, repealed and recreated s. 938.365 (2m) (ag) without taking cognizance of the repeal and recreation of the provision by 2009 Wis. Act 79, section 151. There is no mutual inconsistency between the treatments made by the two acts, and the substantive changes made by Act 79 are made here in order to give effect to both acts.

SB285, s. 102 Section 102. The treatment of 938.38 (3) (intro.) of the statutes by 2009 Wisconsin Act 79 is not repealed by 2009 Wisconsin Act 94. Both treatments stand.

Note: There is no conflict of substance. As merged by the legislative reference bureau, s. 938.38 (3) (intro.) reads:

(3) Time. Subject to sub. (4m) (a), the agency shall file the permanency plan with the court within 60 days after the date on which the juvenile was first removed from his or her home, except under either of the following conditions:

SB285, s. 103 Section 103. 938.38 (4m) of the statutes, as affected by 2009 Wisconsin Act 79, sections 158 and 159, and 2009 Wisconsin Act 94, sections 381 and 382, is repealed and recreated to read:

SB285,47,16 938.38 (4m) Reasonable efforts not required; permanency plan determination hearing. (a) If in a proceeding under s. 938.21, 938.32, 938.355, 938.357, or 938.365 the court finds that any of the circumstances in s. 938.355 (2d) (b) 1. to 4. applies with respect to a parent, the court shall hold a hearing within 30 days after the date of that finding to determine the permanency plan for the juvenile. If a hearing is held under this paragraph, the agency responsible for preparing the permanency plan shall file the permanency plan with the court not less than 5 days before the date of the hearing. At the hearing, the court shall consider placing the juvenile in a placement outside this state if the court determines that such a placement would be in the best interests of the juvenile and appropriate to achieving the goal of the juvenile's permanency plan.

SB285,48,6 (b) At least 10 days before the date of the hearing the court shall notify the juvenile; any parent, guardian, and legal custodian of the juvenile; any foster parent, or other physical custodian described in s. 48.62 (2) of the juvenile, the operator of the facility in which the juvenile is living, or the relative with whom the juvenile is living; and, if the juvenile is an Indian juvenile who is or is alleged to be in need of protection or services under s. 938.13 (4), (6), (6m), or (7), the Indian juvenile's Indian custodian and tribe of the time, place, and purpose of the hearing, of the issues to be determined at the hearing, and of the fact that they shall have a right to be heard at the hearing.

SB285,48,21 (c) If the juvenile's permanency plan includes a statement under sub. (4) (i) indicating that the juvenile's age and developmental level are sufficient for the court to consult with the juvenile regarding the juvenile's permanency plan or if, notwithstanding a decision under sub. (4) (i) that it would not be appropriate for the court to consult with the juvenile, the court determines that consultation with the juvenile would be in the best interests of the juvenile, the court shall consult with the juvenile, in an age-appropriate and developmentally appropriate manner, regarding the juvenile's permanency plan and any other matters the court finds appropriate. If none of those circumstances apply, the court may permit the juvenile's caseworker, the juvenile's counsel, or, subject to s. 938.235 (3) (a), the juvenile's guardian ad litem to make a written or oral statement during the hearing, or to submit a written statement prior to the hearing, expressing the juvenile's wishes, goals, and concerns regarding the permanency plan and those matters. If the court permits such a written or oral statement to be made or submitted, the court may nonetheless require the juvenile to be physically present at the hearing.

SB285,49,4 (d) The court shall give a foster parent, other physical custodian described in s. 48.62 (2), operator of a facility, or relative who is notified of a hearing under par. (b) a right to be heard at the hearing by permitting the foster parent, other physical custodian, operator, or relative to make a written or oral statement during the hearing, or to submit a written statement prior to the hearing, relevant to the issues to be determined at the hearing. The foster parent, other physical custodian, operator of a facility, or relative does not become a party to the proceeding on which the hearing is held solely on the basis of receiving that notice and right to be heard.